While it seems evident to me that libraries of all sorts
suffer from factors like funding and staffing, another aspect that seems to
affect school libraries more severely is censorship, and I believe this is the
most detrimental reason that has caused its demise. Whereas the public library
has the ALA Book of Rights to stand behind, school libraries at often at the
mercy of school boards and concerned parents.
In a case study in which a school board restricted access to
the book Harry Potter in school
libraries, DeMitchell, professor of Education and Justice Studies, and Carney,
professor of Reading, both at Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, discuss the
consequences of restricting student reading. The school board and parents
argued that it encouraged misbehavior, rebellion in school setting, and
witchcraft. However, in similar cases, students have sued against this same
reason, citing the Constitution’s First Amendment and reasoning that ideas cannot be suppressed or restricted
from being presented.
Maybe I prefer to look at the situation is too simplistic a
manner and encourage that children read material that get them excited to read
because that was how I was raised – with no boundaries to the literature I
chose to read. But this ideal is what makes access and reading so beautiful to
me and I so far I haven’t suffered from it, even if I am romanticizing the
notion.
DeMitchell, T. A., & Carney, J. J. (2005). Harry Potter
and the Public School Library. Phi
Delta Kappan, 87(2),
159-165.
No comments:
Post a Comment